A New GOP Global Warming” Theme Plan

Republican John McCain jumped at the opportunity to remind voters that he'd flown nearly to the ends of the earth to view the effects of global warming.

I wonder if he will jump just as fast at the opportunity to remind voters to view his party’s goal is to create a theme. of climate equals higher gas prices each day and the focus is much more on making political points than in amending the bill.

The Republican plan in dealing with the greatest challenge facing this world and this nation is more about making political points than legislating.

McCain told reporters on his campaign bus in Nashville, Tenn.: The message is change. It’s real change. I think it’s my record of reform and efforts to change the way we do business in Washington.

But I guess he did not mean late last night during the Senate debate on the Climate Security Act. It would seem this strategy also seems completely out of touch with this his obligations and the American people's expectation.

To be told the truth and not lead around with misleading agendas to bring about actions. Those that will create repercussions for years to come in the world arena. Not just having effect on us but generations to come.

They talk of important resources. Where this country’s leadership had not slightest notion of the results.

Our nation is being viewed as a bully & war is the order of the day instead of last out come.

A key to Global Warming” is using resources wisely .Vets are a resource that would include people even those who never served in uniform that contribute. They all have knowledge.

A key to foreign policy is communications when that is cut off such as Bush has done he not just alginates himself and the people he represents but are nation as a whole.

Mc Cain’s Message is change. It’s real change. But by following the same policies is not a real change.

Saying just because one’s not served in uniform have any ideas. If this case than I would suggest he rethink this position because the rest who have not severed in uniform are not ignorant either.

In a clip from an article sums things up. McCain's appearance an hour before Obama's victory speech itself spoke volumes.

For a man who spoke with the word "Honor" on hand-held placards all around him, it was a dishonorable thing to do.

Presumptive nominees do not typically deliver primetime speeches just before their rival becomes their general-election opponent to try to inoculate against both his message and his moment.

Democratic leaders did not deliver a primetime speech excoriating McCain an hour before he clinched the Republican nomination.

Barack Obama congratulated him. That's how gentlemen have typically responded to their rivals' ascension to the nomination.

But the content of McCain's speech revealed far more than the fact of it. What voters watched and processed unconsciously and emotionally, even if they could not put their finger on it--was a man who seems utterly rudderless in his principles, punctuating rhetorical lines that belie virtually everything he has said at some point since running for Republican nomination .

At this remark would like to add McCain has been on tape changing his stands on issues depending on whom he’s speaking to.

One Million See McCain's YouTube Problem!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/zp-heller/one-million-see-mccains-y_b_102951.html

McCain has such a poor poker face that he would be well advised just to tell the truth from here on out in his campaign, if there is a truth anymore to tell about whether he cared about the people of New Orleans when they were crying for help from their roofs while he was eating his birthday cake with President Bush, or whether he is for or against the kind of torture he endured as a prisoner or war.

While I understand we can’t predict where we will be in times of trouble its how we react and respond to it when your supposedly a leader.

Being a P.O.W and the torture he endured as a prisoner of war that he’s saying makes him better because he served and lived throw it. What makes our brand of torture different from which he received?

Isn’t strange how past events link to the present actions now?

Where the internet improving communication and recording live events that can be forwarded the world over in a blink of an eye.

Tends to make it hard for those to claim they did not say that or they where taken out of context when it’s them saying it.